I would look at Pivotal Tracker http://www.pivotaltracker.com/ or the open source clone: Fulcrum http://wholemeal.co.nz/projects/fulcrum.html
I really like the idea of piles of things (Icebox for anything, Backlog for things that are ready to be worked on, and Current for things that are in progress).
We already brainstorm about that and we agreed that having too many platforms is not good for new members integration. So github + loomio + diaspora itself should be enough.
Hey, I would agree that a roadmap is quite important, to convince members that diaspora is actively in development.
I’ve attempted to check out the pivotal tracker on a few occasions with no success?
Why not have a roadmap page on the wiki?
The problem with Pivotal Tracker is that it doesn’t scale very well to community development. It’s really better designed for small teams of people that are all working together in the same room.
I wouldn’t be against using something like Trello for task tracking, but as fla pointed out, we don’t want to have too many platforms all at the same time.
Is this really an open issue? I think current structure with GItHub, revamped https://diasporafoundation.org/, Wiki and Loomio is sufficient. Can we close this?
Wilhelm, a ‘to do’ list or road map is different from Github issue tracker, the project site, or Loomio discussions. It’s a tool for strategic planning ahead rather than reactively, making and maintaining a list of the items that are considered crucial to the project’s success so that they can be planned, worked on and implemented.
Goob: Understood. But we do have a wiki. Why not use that?
The to-do list is on the wiki!
But a wiki is no good for discussion or proposals, which is what Loomio is good for. Each platform has its own benefits and drawbacks, and we should use each for the things which they are best at.
@wilhelm my message was only to point that I updated the todo list and I encourage devs to add / modify the topics which should be treated in priority.